Yeah…you read that right. How does that make you feel? It would be a bad day any day somebody would tell me I can’t send my child’s lunch to school.
“Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school,” principal Elsa Carmona told the paper of the years-old policy. “It’s about … the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It’s milk versus a Coke.” Principal Carmona needs some educating. She’s looking ignorant. I get their issue: milk vs. Coke. I respect their concerns but not how they go about resolving the issue. Address the parents individually that pack unhealthy lunches for their children. DUH. Educate those ignorant to the labels on packaged foods and explain the affects of high salt and high sugar on their child’s behavior, you don’t decide for the entire school to ban lunches from home. Banning parents from sending lunch promotes ignorance. It’s my prerogative as a parent to send my child’s lunch and if I send it they better eat it. Better yet, as a stay at home mom – don’t make me come up there during lunch time to sit with my child and watch them eat MY lunch from home.
As a parent I have my concerns about school lunch. Is it fresh? Is it delicious? Will my child eat it? Are the portions large enough? If it’s a hot meal, is it served cold or warm enough? Was it prepared with clean hands? Did the staff wear hair nets? When was the last time the cafeteria was inspected? What grade did it receive? Is the USDA doing their job? *side eye* Let’s address all of that.
The issue has now become telling me, as a parent, what I can/can’t send for my child’s lunch. NOBODY can tell me that, I’m not having it and I am sure I am not alone on this issue. Educate the parents sending the unhealthy lunches and leave the rest of us who have common sense alone.
original article: http://yhoo.it/fKml73